Difference between revisions of "Talk:PowerDNS LDAP Backend/Example"
From Linuxnetworks
(New page: == SRV Records == Could someone please provide an example for such records with dnsdomain2.schema?) |
(→dc object for tree mode) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== SRV Records == | == SRV Records == | ||
+ | |||
Could someone please provide an example for such records with dnsdomain2.schema? | Could someone please provide an example for such records with dnsdomain2.schema? | ||
+ | |||
+ | A SRV record should look like: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 0 5 5060 sipserver.example.com | ||
+ | |||
+ | The fields are: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ; Priority : the priority of the target host | ||
+ | ; Weight : A relative weight for records with the same priority | ||
+ | ; Port : the TCP or UDP port on which the service is to be found | ||
+ | ; Target : the host name of the machine providing the service. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Nose|Nose]] 23:14, 12 June 2007 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == dc object for tree mode == | ||
+ | |||
+ | dn: dc=1,dc=0,dc=1,dc=10,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa,ou=hosts,o=linuxnetworks,c=de | ||
+ | objectclass: top | ||
+ | objectclass: dnsdomain2 | ||
+ | objectclass: domainrelatedobject | ||
+ | '''dc: 1.0''' | ||
+ | ptrrecord: server.linuxnetworks.de | ||
+ | associateddomain: 1.0.1.10.in-addr.arpa | ||
+ | |||
+ | shouldn't dc: be "1" instead of "1.0" ? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Yes, that would be much cleaner. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Nose|Nose]] 18:23, 16 August 2007 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 17:23, 16 August 2007
SRV Records
Could someone please provide an example for such records with dnsdomain2.schema?
A SRV record should look like:
0 5 5060 sipserver.example.com
The fields are:
- Priority
- the priority of the target host
- Weight
- A relative weight for records with the same priority
- Port
- the TCP or UDP port on which the service is to be found
- Target
- the host name of the machine providing the service.
--Nose 23:14, 12 June 2007 (CEST)
dc object for tree mode
dn: dc=1,dc=0,dc=1,dc=10,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa,ou=hosts,o=linuxnetworks,c=de objectclass: top objectclass: dnsdomain2 objectclass: domainrelatedobject dc: 1.0 ptrrecord: server.linuxnetworks.de associateddomain: 1.0.1.10.in-addr.arpa
shouldn't dc: be "1" instead of "1.0" ?
Yes, that would be much cleaner.
--Nose 18:23, 16 August 2007 (CEST)