Difference between revisions of "Talk:PowerDNS LDAP Backend/Example"
From Linuxnetworks
(→SRV Records) |
(→dc object for tree mode) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
--[[User:Nose|Nose]] 23:14, 12 June 2007 (CEST) | --[[User:Nose|Nose]] 23:14, 12 June 2007 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == dc object for tree mode == | ||
| + | |||
| + | dn: dc=1,dc=0,dc=1,dc=10,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa,ou=hosts,o=linuxnetworks,c=de | ||
| + | objectclass: top | ||
| + | objectclass: dnsdomain2 | ||
| + | objectclass: domainrelatedobject | ||
| + | '''dc: 1.0''' | ||
| + | ptrrecord: server.linuxnetworks.de | ||
| + | associateddomain: 1.0.1.10.in-addr.arpa | ||
| + | |||
| + | shouldn't dc: be "1" instead of "1.0" ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, that would be much cleaner. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Nose|Nose]] 18:23, 16 August 2007 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:23, 16 August 2007
SRV Records
Could someone please provide an example for such records with dnsdomain2.schema?
A SRV record should look like:
0 5 5060 sipserver.example.com
The fields are:
- Priority
- the priority of the target host
- Weight
- A relative weight for records with the same priority
- Port
- the TCP or UDP port on which the service is to be found
- Target
- the host name of the machine providing the service.
--Nose 23:14, 12 June 2007 (CEST)
dc object for tree mode
dn: dc=1,dc=0,dc=1,dc=10,dc=in-addr,dc=arpa,ou=hosts,o=linuxnetworks,c=de objectclass: top objectclass: dnsdomain2 objectclass: domainrelatedobject dc: 1.0 ptrrecord: server.linuxnetworks.de associateddomain: 1.0.1.10.in-addr.arpa
shouldn't dc: be "1" instead of "1.0" ?
Yes, that would be much cleaner.
--Nose 18:23, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
